Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 55-59, March 2010

Retrospective Statistical Power: Fallacies and Recommendations

  • Lihshing Leigh Wang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Lihshing Leigh Wang, PhD, Educational Studies Program, School of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.

Educational Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

The calculation of statistical power after a study has been concluded is a highly controversial practice in quantitative research. Retrospective power in association with statistical nonsignificance presents special challenge to applied researchers in interpreting their statistical outcomes. The purposes of the present study are to review the current debate on retrospective power analysis, to examine the evidential basis of some myths associated with it, and to recommend some practical guidelines for quantitative researchers. I first briefly explain the theoretical concepts of prospective and retrospective power. I then describe three fallacies in misusing and abusing retrospective power. I conclude by providing some recommendations for improving the statistical practice associated with statistically nonsignificant findings.

Keywords: Retrospective power, Post hoc power, Observed power, Statistical testing, Effect size, Confidence interval

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1527-3369(09)00180-9

doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.012

Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 55-59, March 2010