Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 19-26, March 2010

A Primer on Propensity Score Analysis

  • William R. Shadish, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Social Science, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to William R. Shadish, PhD, School of Social Science, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, 5200 N. Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343.
  • ,
  • Peter M. Steiner, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

This article discusses the role that propensity score analysis can play in assessing the effects of interventions. It mostly focuses on identifying the range of solutions to practical problems that occur in propensity score analysis, especially with regard to propensity score construction (logistic regression, classification trees, ensemble methods), balancing (significance tests, other metrics), and analysis (matching, stratifying, weighting, covariance). Throughout, the article will identify particularly important or common pitfalls that need to be avoided in these analyses. The article ends with a discussion of the comparative advantages and disadvantages of propensity scores compared to alternative analytic and design options.

Keywords: Propensity score, Matching, Nonrandomized experiment, Randomized experiment, Strong ignorability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors were supported in part by grant R305U070003 from the Institute for Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. The second author was also supported by grants from the Spencer Foundation and W.T. Grant Foundation.

PII: S1527-3369(09)00178-0

doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.010

Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 19-26, March 2010