Journal Home
Search for

Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 10-18 (March 2010)


View previous. 8 of 15 View next.

Potential Pitfalls in Collecting and Analyzing Longitudinal Data From Chronically Ill Populations

Diane Holditch-Davis, PhD, RN, FAANCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Janet Levy, PhDemail address

Research on the prevention and management of chronic illnesses involves understanding changes in complex and interrelated aspects of each individual. To capture these changes or to control for them, nursing and health research needs to be longitudinal. However, there are a number of potential pitfalls in analyzing longitudinal data from a chronically ill population. This article will examine four major pitfalls: selection of time points, measurement, choosing appropriate statistical procedures, and missing values. Although the frequency of data collection is often driven primarily by practical concerns, it will affect the results. In addition, outcome measures may capture different constructs at different points in times. Traditional analysis techniques often have assumptions about data characteristics that are violated in clinical populations. Missing values are common in research with chronically ill individuals because of problems of subject retention and because individuals have frequent medical complications. Solutions to these pitfalls are also discussed.

Duke University School of Nursing, Box 3322 DUMC, Durham, NC

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Diane Holditch-Davis, PhD, RN, FAAN, Duke University School of Nursing, Box 3322 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710.

 The preparation of this article was partially supported by grants R01 NR009418, R01 NR01894, and R01 NR05263 from the National Institute for Nursing Research, NIH to the first author.

PII: S1527-3369(09)00171-8

doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.003


View previous. 8 of 15 View next.