Quantitative Research Methodology: Common Pitfalls and Recommended Solutions

References 

1. In:  Klee R editors. Scientific inquiry: readings in the philosophy of science. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999;
2. Yu CH. Philosophical foundations of quantitative research methodology. Lanham (MD): Rowman and Littlefield; 2006;
3. Atiqi R, van Iersel C, Cleophas TJ. Accuracy assessments of quantitative diagnostic tests for clinical research. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Ther Toxicol. 2009;47:153–158
4. Carter BM, Holditch-Davis D. Risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: how race, gender, and health status contribute. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008;8:285–290
5. DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care. 2004;42:200–209
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Holditch-Davis D. Correlates of mother-premature infant interactions. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:333–346
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Slavin RE. Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ Res. 2002;31:15–21
8. Sloane F. Comments on Slavin: through the looking glass: experiments, quasi-experiments, and the medical model. Educ Res. 2008;37:41–46
9. Gelo O, Braakmann D, Benetka G. Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2008;42:266–290
   • CrossRef
10. In:  Hancock GR,  Samuelsen KM editor. Latent variable mixture models. Charlotte (NC): Information Age; 2008;
11. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks (Calif): Sage; 2009;
12. Huck SW. Statistical misconceptions. New York: Routledge; 2009;
13. Good PI, Hardin JM. Common errors in statistics (and how to avoid them). Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2003;
14. In:  Lance CE,  Vandenberg RJ editor. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends. New York: Routledge; 2009;
15. In:  Osborne JW editors. Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks (Calif): Sage; 2008;
16. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston (Mass): Houghton Mifflin; 2002;
17. von Davier M. Mixture distribution item response models. In:  Embretson S editors. New directions in psychological measurement with model-based approaches. Washington, DC: APA Press; 2009;
18. von Davier M. WINMIRA 2001. A Windows program for analyses with the Rasch model, with the latent class analysis and with the mixed Rasch model. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation; 2000;
19. Fidler F, Cumming G. The new stats: attitudes for the 21st century. In:  Osborne JW editors. Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks (Calif): Sage; 2008;p. 1–12
20. Evans JG. Ethical problems of futile research. J Med Ethics. 1997;23:5–6
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
21. Osborne JW. Using best practices is a moral and ethical obligation. In:  Osborne JW editors. Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks (Calif): Sage; 2008;p. ix–xii