« Previous
Next »
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 7, Issue 4
, Pages 205-210
, December 2007
Advances in Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current Options, Benefits, and Limitations
References
- . Prenatal genetics: the evolution and future directions of screening and diagnosis. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2006;20:93–97
- . An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:721–729
- First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1405–1413
- . Integrated screening for Down's syndrome based on tests performed during the first and second trimesters. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:461–467
- PCR quantification of fetal cells in maternal blood in normal and aneuploid pregnancies. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:822–829
- Fetal gender and aneuploidy detection using fetal cells in maternal blood: analysis of NIFTY I data. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:609–615
- Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350:485–487
- Fetal DNA detection in maternal plasma throughout gestation. Hum Genet. 2005;117:243–248
- Early detection of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:563–566
- A non-invasive test for prenatal diagnosis based on fetal DNA present in maternal blood: a preliminary study. Lancet. 2007;369:474–481
- . Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:612–616
- . What's new in prenatal screening and diagnosis?. Prim Care Clin Office Pract. 2004;31:561–582
- False-negative findings in chorionic villus sampling. An experimental approach and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1276–1282
- Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1067–1072
- . Amniocentesis and fetal blood sampling. In: Milunsky A editors. Genetic disorders and the fetus. 4th ed.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998;p. 53–82
- . Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:451
- . Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:451–452
- . Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:452
- . Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:780
- . Percutaneous umbilical blood sampling: result from a multicenter collaborative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1614–1618
- Cordocentesis for rapid karyotyping. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1548–1553
- Cordocentesis for rapid karyotyping in fetuses with congenital anomalies or severe IUGR. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;53:183–187
- Percutaneous umbilical blood sampling: indication changes and procedure loss rate in a nine years' experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1996;11:106–113
- . Complications of diagnostic ultrasound-guided percutaneous umbilical blood sampling: analysis of a series of 341 cases and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;53:95–104
- . Prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH. Eur J Med Genet. 2005;48:232–240
- . Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Gen. 2007;Part C145C:87–98
- Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH. J Med Genet. 2006;43:353–361
- Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR. Assessment on 18000 consecutive clinical samples. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:839–846
- Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescence PCR: first application on 247 chorionic villus samples. J Med Genet. 1999;36:300–303
- . Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 2nd ed.. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996;
- Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet. 2005;42:121–128
- . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. In: Milunsky A editors. Genetic disorders and the fetus: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. 4th ed.. Baltimore (Md): the Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998;p. 911–930
PII: S1527-3369(07)00143-2
doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2007.09.012
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 7, Issue 4
, Pages 205-210
, December 2007
