Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 241-242 , December 2006

A Trial Analysis of Umbilical Venous Catheters: The Long and Short of It

  • Holly Mincey, RN, BSN (Column Editor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondences to Holly Mincey, RN, BSN, 8223 Alpine Aster Court, Liberty Township, OH 45044, USA

References 

  1. Apostolopoulo E, Lambridou M, Lambadaridis I. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Br J Nurs. 2004;13:806–812
  2. Cartwright DW. Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2186 catheters, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F504–F508
  3. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Pediatrics. 2002;110:51
  4. Loisel DB, Smith MM, MacDonald MG, Martin GR. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines. J Perinatology. 1996;16:461–466
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Guidelines for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:1–32[Website http://www.cdc.gov/]
  6. Butler-Ohara M, Buzzard CJ, MacDermott MP, DiGrazio W, D'Angio CT. A randomized trial comparing long-term and short-term use of umbilical venous catheters in premature infants with birth weights of less than 1251 grams. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e25–e35

PII: S1527-3369(06)00107-3

doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2006.09.009

Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 241-242 , December 2006